Insolvency under self-administration: restructuring rather than liquidation

 
Why self-administration is often the better solution for small and medium-sized enterprises

Self-administered insolvency in small and medium-sized enterprises as an opportunity for corporate restructuring – managing directors on the path to a successful future

In the SME sector, insolvency is still equated with failure. Yet in many cases, it is exactly the opposite: a structured fresh start under legal protection.

Self-administered insolvency, in particular, offers companies the opportunity to restructure under court supervision – without relinquishing operational control.

Used correctly, it is not an emergency measure, but a strategic tool.

What exactly does self-administration mean?

Under self-administration, the management remains in office and continues to run the company. Unlike in standard insolvency proceedings, no insolvency administrator takes over operational control.

Instead:

  • The management remains able to act
  • a trustee supervises the proceedings
  • the court oversees the process

The aim is to restructure the company – not to wind it up.

The key benefits of self-administration

Self-administration offers a number of advantages that are often overlooked in traditional crisis management:

1. Control remains within the company
Management remains in the driver’s seat.

This is particularly crucial for small and medium-sized enterprises – where business often depends on personal networks, expertise and trust.

2. Liquidity through insolvency payments
The Federal Employment Agency covers wages and salaries for up to three months.

This provides:

  • immediate relief on liquidity
  • time for operational stabilisation

3. Adaptable contract and cost structure

  • Options to terminate ongoing contractual relationships
  • Adjustment of lease and supply contracts
  • Staff measures under simplified conditions

This creates genuine restructuring levers that are often unattainable outside of insolvency proceedings.

4. Attractiveness to investors
A company under self-administration is:

  • structured
  • legally ‘cleared up’
  • often more attractive to investors

Key term: transfer-based restructuring / M&A during proceedings

BUSE Practical Guide: When self-administration works – and when it doesn’t

Works well if:

  • the operational business is viable
  • the crisis is primarily financial in nature
  • the management is capable of acting and making decisive decisions
  • preparations are made at an early stage

Becomes critical if:

  • the response is too late
  • there are no reliable figures available
  • there is a lack of internal leadership
  • stakeholders are not involved

Key point: Self-administration is not a lifeline for chaos, but a tool for structured restructuring.

The most common mistake: acting too late

In practice, we see time and again:
Self-administration is only considered once the scope for action is already severely restricted.

This leads to:

  • reduced chances of restructuring
  • less confidence among creditors
  • greater pressure during the proceedings

Our clear recommendation:
Self-administration must be prepared for – not improvised.

How to do it right

Successful self-administration follows a clear pattern:

  • Early analysis of the financial situation
  • robust cash flow planning
  • a clear communication strategy towards creditors
  • Involvement of experienced advisers
  • Coordination with the court and the administrator

The better the preparation, the greater the chance of success.

Conclusion

Insolvency under self-administration is not a stigma, but a highly effective restructuring tool.

Used correctly, it offers the chance to stabilise, restructure and secure the long-term future of a company.

Or to put it bluntly:
Those who wait too long lose options. Those who act early gain room for manoeuvre.