Compliance 2026: Five concrete steps for management and supervisory boards

 
NIS2, whistleblower protection, and ESG: integrating them in a pragmatic, effective, and feasible way

Compliance 2026 – Management signs document with digital compliance dashboard for risk monitoring, audit trail and regulation in the background

New compliance issues such as NIS2, whistleblower protection, and ESG may seem complex at first glance. In practice, however, they can be implemented in a structured manner with manageable effort. The key is not perfection, but a clear, documented approach. For management and supervisory boards, the current requirements can be broken down into five concrete steps.

Step 1: Update risks – don’t reinvent them

The starting point is not a fundamental discussion, but a targeted update of the existing risk analysis:

  • IT and cyber risks (NIS2)
  • Internal reporting systems and response processes
  • ESG and supply chain risks

Existing risk overviews are often sufficient – they just need to be supplemented and prioritized.

Step 2: Clearly define responsibilities

Compliance rarely fails because of rules, but because of ambiguity. It is important to have:

  • clear overall responsibility at management level
  • designated contact persons for IT, HR, and legal
  • transparent reporting lines to the supervisory board

Documented responsibilities create certainty and relieve the burden.

Step 3: Update existing regulations

Many companies already have:

  • a code of conduct
  • a compliance manual
  • internal guidelines

These should be specifically adapted, not rewritten – for example, by adding short additions on NIS2, whistleblower protection, and ESG. Less scope, more relevance.

Step 4: Keep training short, regular, and practical

Instead of extensive training programs, we recommend:

  • A compact update format (e.g., 90–120 minutes)
  • Focus on new risks and typical practical cases
  • Documented participation

This makes training a living part of corporate management.

Step 5: Check effectiveness – without bureaucracy

Finally, a quick check is all it takes:

  • Are reporting systems being used?
  • Are responsibilities known?
  • Are risks reported regularly?

Short reports to management and the supervisory board are usually sufficient to meet documentation and control requirements.

Compliance 2026 is not a mammoth project.

With five clear steps, new obligations can be implemented pragmatically, effectively, and in a legally compliant manner—without unnecessary bureaucracy, but with tangible added value for management and supervision.

The most important points in brief

  • New compliance issues can be integrated in a structured manner
  • Existing systems are the right starting point
  • Clarity and timeliness are more important than scope