Step 1: Update risks – don’t reinvent them
The starting point is not a fundamental discussion, but a targeted update of the existing risk analysis:
- IT and cyber risks (NIS2)
- Internal reporting systems and response processes
- ESG and supply chain risks
Existing risk overviews are often sufficient – they just need to be supplemented and prioritized.
Step 2: Clearly define responsibilities
Compliance rarely fails because of rules, but because of ambiguity. It is important to have:
- clear overall responsibility at management level
- designated contact persons for IT, HR, and legal
- transparent reporting lines to the supervisory board
Documented responsibilities create certainty and relieve the burden.
Step 3: Update existing regulations
Many companies already have:
- a code of conduct
- a compliance manual
- internal guidelines
These should be specifically adapted, not rewritten – for example, by adding short additions on NIS2, whistleblower protection, and ESG. Less scope, more relevance.
Step 4: Keep training short, regular, and practical
Instead of extensive training programs, we recommend:
- A compact update format (e.g., 90–120 minutes)
- Focus on new risks and typical practical cases
- Documented participation
This makes training a living part of corporate management.
Step 5: Check effectiveness – without bureaucracy
Finally, a quick check is all it takes:
- Are reporting systems being used?
- Are responsibilities known?
- Are risks reported regularly?
Short reports to management and the supervisory board are usually sufficient to meet documentation and control requirements.
Compliance 2026 is not a mammoth project.
With five clear steps, new obligations can be implemented pragmatically, effectively, and in a legally compliant manner—without unnecessary bureaucracy, but with tangible added value for management and supervision.
The most important points in brief
- New compliance issues can be integrated in a structured manner
- Existing systems are the right starting point
- Clarity and timeliness are more important than scope








